OnlyFans Model Victoria Triece Barred from Volunteering at Children's School
Victoria Triece, a 33-year-old OnlyFans model, has found herself at the center of a heated controversy after being banned from volunteering at Sand Lake Elementary School in Orange County. The ban followed the discovery of her participation on the adult-only subscription website, OnlyFans. Triece, also known for her appearances on the covers of Playboy and FHM magazines, maintains a significant presence online, with over 148,000 followers on Instagram and nearly 264,000 on TikTok.
Background and Legal Battle
Triece has been actively involved in the educational activities of her two sons but was prohibited from volunteering after a parent sent explicit images from her OnlyFans account to the school principal in 2021, despite her having passed extensive background checks annually. Her attorney, Mark NeJame, has criticized the decision by the school board, accusing them of acting as "morality police."
The conflict intensified when Triece filed a lawsuit against Orange County Public Schools (OCPS) in 2023, seeking $1 million in damages. She alleged that the school board violated her rights to free speech and privacy by sharing her OnlyFans photos among staff and with media outlets, describing this act as "sexual cyberharassment."
Judicial Ruling
Orange County Circuit Judge Brian S. Sandor ruled against Triece, stating that she does not possess a "substantive due process right" to volunteer at the school. He highlighted that the volunteer program grants no rights or benefits that would allow an individual to participate, remain, or appeal removal decisions. Furthermore, the court determined that the sharing of Triece's images served a legitimate purpose related to public records requests and situational assessment, thereby dismissing her allegations of sexual cyberharassment.
Impact on Personal and Professional Life
Triece has stated that her work on OnlyFans allows her to support her sons and remain actively involved in their lives. Despite the setback, she continues to underscore the importance of participation in her children's education and aims to be involved in school activities without facing judgment for her online presence.
Broader Implications
The case has ignited extensive discussions on privacy, online content, and parental participation within education systems. An essential part of this debate is balancing personal freedoms against community standards within educational settings. Although the legal outcome was not in her favor, Triece remains an outspoken advocate for her rights to engage in her children’s educational experiences without discrimination based on her online activities.
